Management of Leftover Medicine Associated with the Change of Prescription Form through Collaboration between General Practitioners and Community Pharmacists : A Research Survey / 社会薬学

The purpose of this study was to explore issues arising from the promotion of collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists in the management of leftover medicine. The 2016 Revision of Medical Fee newly added the check boxes in the prescription form in which a physician requests the correspondence of a pharmacy when confirming leftover medicine. In this study, we conducted a questionnaire survey among GPs in three wards of Tokyo in the month of November 2016. Of the 1,256 clinics queried, 283 responded to the survey. Among those GPs responding, 86.6% were concerned about leftover medicine of their patients, while 29.3% used the check boxes. GPs who received an explanation about the change of the prescription form demonstrated a significant increase in the use of the check boxes, compared to GPs who did not (p<0.01). Of the GPs surveyed, 71.0% thought that the check boxes were an advantage in recognizing medicines that the patients did not take. An overall 67.5% of the GPs who used the check boxes revised prescriptions based on the information from pharmacists. The study suggests that by increasing collaboration between GPs and pharmacists, the information from pharmacists could be utilized to revise prescriptions and lead optimization of drug treatment.

The ideal focus of the study in the drug information sciences / 医薬品情報学

  In 2008, Japanese Society of Drug Informatics (JASDI) organized the Future Vision Committee (the Committee) to propose the essential focus of drug informatics.  To explore a future vision about the drug information sciences, it was necessary to collect a variety of opinions widely from researchers.  Therefore, at the 11^th annual meeting of JASDI in July 5-6, 2008, the Committee convened a workshop to extract problems in the researches of drug informatics by using KJ method and evaluated the contents.  The major problems raised were “the field of drug informatics is too broad” and “there is no definition and/or no system of the drug informatics”.  Related problems raised are the shortness of the history and lack of originality in the study.  From different viewpoints, it was also pointed out that the methodology of the research is not well established and no systematic education is provided.  Taken together, major problems in drug informatics are concluded to be the lack of definition and the lack of systematizations, and will be solved to a certain extent by defining the outcome of the researches in drug informatics.